God, as a philosophical concept, is an omniscient, perfect being.

If we aim to achieve truth, then, we must examine the nature of an omniscient being, regardless of if such a being truly exists.

If such a being did exist, it would be incomprehensible. Therefore, our telescope to examine is one of flawed human logic. God exists above this logic, however, it is the only one at our disposal. So we employ.

God must think and act in absolutes. If he is all knowing, then he is "all doing", or "all done" Because His knowledge is instantaneous and perfect, his actions must be the same.

But just how is his knowledge perfected? It is because He transcends knowledge, and sits above it and its restrictions. Therefore, In order best reach a God level of thought, one must put themselves above knowledge.

How is that done? To put it simply: radical objectivity.

Have you ever heard an idea that gave you a somewhat "physical" reaction? Anger in your stomach, disdain for a friend? Anger is a concept a perfect God must be above. Therefore, Anger must come from humanity, it is a human concept. That human concept is born from things such as: morality, ego, and a sense of justice. All three of these things are not necessarily bad, but it is the birthplace of anger.

That's to say, it's okay to be Angry when confronted with the immoral. However. God is above all humanly concepts. In order to think like a god, one must transcend the human limitations of morality and reasoning.

It is for this reason that, like a super intelligent AI, one must take in data objectively. To be above knowledge is to not allow your OWN knowledge of right vs wrong, sane vs insane to restrict you. To be truly open minded.

Weigh all the options. Nothing is ever. Ever. Off the table.

Does this mean you must sit down and discuss the philosophies of a Nazi? A rapist? A pedophile? Not necessarily. It does mean, however, that one must know thy enemy.

Any belief that has not thoroughly examined the entire situation with a God-level objectivity, is a belief strife with bias, emotion, cognitive dissonance, and ultimately little more than a wild guess. You must know exactly why your feet stand in opposition.

The more one can argue against his own belief, the more true this belief MUST be. That is a logical absolute.

Remember: The best essays have counterarguments written in.

One must read this manifesto with "God-Thought" and radical objectivity in mind. The Truth is absurd, wild, and crazy. It is imperative to not dismiss the Truth because of the human concept of what one believes the world to be. Only once one has fully committed themselves to "God-Thought", may one be capable of holding the Truth and knowing it to be. 

In short, the purpose of this preface is to separate the signal of reality from the noise of human perception. If that noise is present, then logic is flawed.